This article reviews a wide range of studies that have placed considerable and even preeminent emphasis on the spatial aspect of Israeli history. They challenge the conventional understanding and concepts of space. These studies use the spatial perspective to contest existing perceptions of the foundation and consolidation of the Israeli state in the land of Israel. One of the significant turning points in writing on the Israeli “place” (makom) over the past decades starting with the first Intifada, is interpretational in nature, and is expressed in the separation and dismantling of deep-rooted and prevalent causal arguments and their replacement by others. Space takes on different forms, moving between physical, visible and tangible aspects and functional, political, and symbolic spheres. The increasing attention paid to space is part of the growing general criticism of the Zionist settlement movement by scholars who refuse to continue to interpret it on its own terms. What all the studies reviewed in this article have in common is the contemporary challenging of the Jewish-Israeli cognitive map, which is oblivious to the former Palestinian residents. The spatial perspective of Israel studies provides a new understanding. From the spatial perspective, as opposed to public discourse, 1967 does not necessarily appear to be a turning point. With the continuation of the state of occupation created by the events of 1967, this point in time has become a chronic rather than an acute situation. The spatial perspective facilitates methodical analysis and exposes causal relationships between the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israeli society’s internal social debates and conflicts.